Therapeutic Disclosure Preparation
Examinee-completed CSBD disclosure review for identifying clarification, timeline, and question-development needs before focused therapeutic polygraph work.
Structured therapeutic and research tools for disclosure review, preparation, and ethical assessment support.
Credibility Systems hosts reflective, educational, and pilot-stage tools for organising assessment-relevant information. The platform supports structured disclosure preparation, therapeutic question development, relationship-trust reflection, and research into decision-support methods. These tools do not provide determinations of fact, clinical diagnoses, legal conclusions, or substitutes for professional care.
Current Tools
These tools are designed for reflection, preparation, and structured discussion. They are not truth tests, diagnoses, legal evidence, or substitutes for professional support.
Examinee-completed CSBD disclosure review for identifying clarification, timeline, and question-development needs before focused therapeutic polygraph work.
Practitioner-facing review aid for assessing disclosure clarity, completeness, temporal anchoring, and operational suitability for focused question development.
Brief reflective questionnaire for mapping relationship trust strain, uncertainty, and areas for professional discussion.
Extended relationship-trust and concealment-concern reflection tool with domain-level reporting for careful review.
Structured examiner support for drafting, refining, and documenting relevant, comparison, and review questions before assessment.
Examiner-facing support tool for selecting, editing, justifying, and reviewing Directed Lie Comparison questions for Diagnostic Single-Issue DLC examinations.
Guided pre-test interview workflow for suitability prompts, safeguarding review, question construction, and examiner summary documentation.
Disclosure-language review aid for organising statement features, clarification needs, and examiner notes without treating language patterns as determinations of fact.
Structured calculator for documenting prior probability assumptions, prior-to-odds conversion, rationale wording, and non-determinative Bayesian reasoning.
Professional ESS-to-Bayesian documentation tool with ESS-M table lookup, report-text import assistance, posterior probability calculation, sensitivity review, and printable evidence notes.
About the Platform
The platform hosts structured tools and pilot-study materials for therapeutic preparation, disclosure review, and assessment-support research.
Structured questionnaires designed for pilot testing in credibility research contexts.
Frameworks for organising and evaluating behavioural indicators relevant to credibility assessment.
Tools for exploring how prior probabilities, base rates, and test accuracy interact in decision-making.
Calculators and reference materials for understanding positive and negative predictive values.
Research into how risk bands can structure reporting and communicate assessment outcomes.
Materials to support informed consent and ethical participation in pilot studies.
Research Areas
Current and planned research themes across the platform.
Exploring how Bayesian reasoning can improve structured credibility decisions by integrating prior probabilities with observed data.
Developing and piloting structured questionnaires for research into behavioural indicators relevant to credibility assessment.
Investigating how risk categories and banded reporting can structure the communication of assessment outcomes.
Research into the evidence base, methodology, and limitations of polygraph screening within structured credibility frameworks.
Examining how base rates of deception, sensitivity, and specificity affect the predictive value of credibility assessment tools.
Developing frameworks that support structured review of disclosure clarity, completeness, timeline anchoring, and focused polygraph question development.
Tools and questionnaires on this site are reflective, educational, or research-oriented measures designed to identify patterns of concern, uncertainty, and perceived trust strain. They are not forensic, clinical, or evidential reports, they do not provide determinations of fact, and they must not be used to pressure, monitor, challenge, test, punish, or coerce another person.
Credibility Systems is a separate research and pilot-study platform. Operational forensic and polygraph examination services are provided through Centre for Forensic Neuroscience.
Visit Centre for Forensic Neuroscience