Full Pilot Questionnaire 185 Items

Relationship Trust and Concealment Assessment

A reflective, educational, and research-oriented tool that identifies patterns of concern, uncertainty, trust strain, and perceived concealment risk in a relationship.

0 / 185 answered

Important Safeguards & Usage Policy

Please read this policy carefully before starting. This is a pilot-stage research and reflective tool, not a forensic or clinical diagnostic system.

Length Warning: The full assessment is detailed and may feel too long or demanding for some users, especially during periods of acute distress. If you feel overwhelmed, distressed, unsafe, or tempted to use the results confrontationally, stop and seek appropriate support.

  • Voluntary Use: This assessment should only be completed voluntarily. It should not be used to pressure, monitor, challenge, test, punish, or coerce another person.
  • Not Proof: A score or result from this assessment does not prove deception, betrayal, infidelity, concealment, or wrongdoing.
  • Not Evidence: This assessment is not designed for evidential, legal, disciplinary, or adversarial use. It should not be presented as proof in a dispute, legal matter, employment matter, or relationship conflict.
  • Not a Substitute: This assessment is not a substitute for therapy, legal advice, safeguarding advice, or professional relationship support.
  • Risk of Misuse: If you intend to use this assessment to confront, accuse, pressure, or challenge another person, you should not use it for that purpose.
  • Coercive Control & Safety: If there is fear, intimidation, threats, coercive control, domestic abuse, stalking, harassment, or risk of harm, do not use this assessment to confront the other person. Seek appropriate professional or safeguarding support.
  • Results Interpretation: Results should be interpreted as indicators of perceived relational concern, uncertainty, or trust strain. They are not determinations of fact.
  • Partner Sharing Warning: Do not demand that a partner complete this assessment or disclose their answers. Do not use the results to interrogate, punish, or pressure them.
  • Solicitor/Legal Warning: This assessment is not a forensic report, expert witness report, or evidential document. It should not be relied upon as legal evidence.

When Not to Use This Assessment

  • You intend to force or pressure someone else to complete it.
  • You intend to use the results to accuse, confront, punish, or interrogate another person.
  • You are currently feeling unsafe, highly distressed, or at risk of harming yourself or someone else.
  • There is domestic abuse, coercive control, stalking, harassment, intimidation, or threats.
  • You want evidence for a legal, employment, disciplinary, or adversarial process.
  • You need urgent safeguarding, legal, therapeutic, or crisis support.

Suitable Uses

  • Personal reflection
  • Research or pilot-study participation
  • Structured therapeutic discussion where appropriate
  • Identifying areas of trust strain or uncertainty
  • Considering whether professional support may be useful

Safeguarding Caution

One or more safeguarding-related items have been endorsed. This means there may be concerns about how this assessment tool could be misused.

This tool must not be used for:

  • Confrontation, interrogation, or accusation
  • Coercion, threats, or emotional pressure
  • Surveillance, tracking, or monitoring of another person
  • Making decisions that could cause harm to yourself or others
  • As a substitute for professional support, counselling, or legal advice

If you are experiencing distress, please consider speaking with a qualified counsellor, therapist, or contacting a support helpline.

Important Notice & Disclaimer

This document is not a forensic report, expert report, legal document, clinical assessment, or proof of deception or wrongdoing. It is a self-report reflective summary only. It should not be used to confront, pressure, punish, monitor, or coerce another person.

Domain-Level Reported Patterns

Overall Concern Level

Provisional Concern Band
—
Pilot model notice: This result is based on a provisional pilot model. The likelihood ratios and concern bands have not yet been empirically validated and should be interpreted as decision-support only.
Important Interpretation Guide: These results are not proof of deception, betrayal, infidelity, or concealment. They reflect patterns of responses associated with trust strain, uncertainty, and perceived concealment concern. They should be used for reflection or professional discussion only, not confrontation, accusation, coercion, or legal evidence.

Trust Vulnerability Profile

Vulnerability Level
—
No diagnostic risk label calculated

Relationship Trust Context

This section evaluates internal relationship interpretation styles, attachment history, and trust sensitivities.

Elevated scores in this domain may arise from:

  • Attachment insecurity
  • Prior betrayal
  • Unresolved relational trauma
  • Communication difficulties
  • Fear of abandonment
  • Ambiguity intolerance
  • Current relationship instability

Important: These findings are NOT evidence of deception, infidelity, or wrongdoing.

Construct Analysis: Concealment vs. Trust Vulnerability

This dual-construct display separates indicators of potential concealment (active secrecy or inconsistencies) from trust vulnerabilities (personal attachment patterns or trust sensitivities). These are independent dimensions.

Concealment Concern

—

Reflects the probability of active concealment, digital secrecy, or behavioural inconsistencies. This estimate is computed using Bayesian likelihood updating.

Trust Vulnerability Profile

—

Reflects internal relationship interpretation styles, attachment-related anxiety, emotional avoidance, or prior betrayal impact. This construct is non-diagnostic.

Professional Caution: This assessment evaluates patterns of concern, trust perception, and relationship interpretation styles. It cannot establish factual deception, infidelity, or concealed behaviour. Findings should be interpreted cautiously within broader relational and contextual factors.

Sensitivity Analysis: Effect of Different Prior Assumptions

The table below shows how the result changes under different prior probability assumptions. The default prior of 15% is a cautious starting point. Lower priors produce more conservative results.

Prior Probability Posterior Estimate Concern Band Cap Applied

Download or Print Acknowledgement

Generated by Credibility Systems — Relationship Trust and Concealment Assessment (Pilot)
This report is for structured personal reflection only. It does not constitute proof, diagnosis, or professional advice.
This assessment evaluates patterns of concern, trust perception, and relationship interpretation styles. It cannot establish factual deception, infidelity, or concealed behaviour. Findings should be interpreted cautiously within broader relational and contextual factors.
© Credibility Systems | www.credibility.systems